The student weekly of St. Olaf | Tuesday, September 2, 2014 | Subscribe
ISSUE 119 VOL 7 PUBLISHED 11/4/2005

'Saw' sequel, bloody good movie

By Jon Warner
Contributing Writer


Friday, November 4, 2005

“Oh yes, there will be blood.” So goes the tagline from the movie posters and so too goes the movie “Saw II.” The sequel to the surprise box-office hit “Saw,” picks up right where the original left off – with gore, gore and more gore. Even before the opening credits roll a victim is bloodily disposed of, forced to gouge his own eye out in search of a key that has been surgically placed in his head.

“Saw II” brings back the aptly named serial killer Jigsaw, played surprisingly well by Tobin Bell, who creatively finds gruesome and disturbing ways to knock off victims, often with ironic twists.

However, Jigsaw always leaves an “out” for his victims, offering them a chance of life if they can muster the strength and desire for survival. Jigsaw plays a much more prominent role in “Saw II” with more face time and offers more of an explanation as to why he does what he does.

The helpless people caught in Jigsaw’s latest trap are burnt-out Detective Eric Mathews (Donnie Wahlberg) and his partner Kerry (Dina Myer).

Jigsaw taunts Mathews with live video feed of his next would-be-victims trapped in a house; one of those people being Mathews’ teenage son, Daniel (Erik Knudson).

Mathews is forced to watch while Daniel and the others attempt to find the antidote for a poison that is slowly being emitted within the house. Of course, the antidote can only be found by going through a series of traps that include a pit full of dirty syringes, a cage lined with razor blades and a fiery furnace. Obviously, not everyone makes it through these traps alive and well.

The plot of “Saw II” offers just as many twists and turns as the original, and the finale, taken with some suspension of disbelief, ends up being quite satisfying (depending on your point of view). The acting is much crisper than the first (no Cary Elwes), while the directing and pacing of the movie make sure that not a dull moment can be found.

While “Saw” produced more psychological torture, both to the audience and to the victims on screen, “Saw II” still delivers but in a different vein. “Saw II” offers up much more horrific and disturbing scenes than the first, with a much more shock and awe approach. However, “Saw II” lacks the air of newness and creativity of the first film.

“Saw II” is not quite as good as the first, but it still offers a lot of entertainment value. Obviously, if you do not enjoy horror films, this is not the movie for you.

However, if you enjoy a good slasher film, by all means go see “Saw II,” especially if you enjoyed the first one. But, be warned; you will need a strong stomach to handle the blood and more blood in “Saw II.”





Printer Friendly version of this page Printer friendly version | E-mail a Copy of the Article to a Friend Email this | Write the editors | More articles by Jon Warner

Related Links

More Stories

Page Load: 94 milliseconds